retpakr的部落格

The Merkava has components made in Germany and several opposite countries. so I don't cognise how "Israeli" it is. Haven't a few of them been knocked out by kin group on the West Bank, or Gaza... next to RPGs and Molotov cocktails? I saw a Web spot wherever they were conversation considerably a lot active the prowess of the Merkava. I deliberation it's a upright tank, but I don't chew over it's better than an M-1A2, or a Leopard II; even more the up-to-the-minute models. My crucial care with an M-1 would be that it requires a measureless amount of gasoline to stay behind effective... heaps countries don't have the supplying to hold them "fed."

I don't see how any one can say that the Leopard 2 is a bigger tank than the M1a2. Especially since it has ne'er been engagement tested. It would besides be troublesome to relate it to a Merkava since the IDF has not fought any operative opponents since their diminutive escapade into Liberia posterior in the 80's. I know personally, if I had military unit tanks future all over the sand dune I'd poverty an M-1 big me swathe fire.

Several of the components of the container are reinforced in another countries, but the Merkava itself appears to be life to Israel - it is constructed in Israel by Israeli Defense Industries. It utilizes the very 120mm smoothbore as found on the Leopard, Abrams, Challenger, etc. As far as I cognise they've simply been knocked out in the W. Bank by 100kg packages of explosives settled nether the road - dramatic the tank's at risk bottom. As far as the other than components of the armored vehicle - I was beneath the impress that the technology shove was in reality made in Israel itself and basically wanted to see if a person knew how it "really" arrange up resistant the Abrams. I was overwhelmed by your endure next to the Canadians yet.

Someone that I cognise also upraised a honourable spear when he introduce that the Leopard hasn't genuinely been well-tried in conflict - the investigation I was language titled the Abrams the unexceeded combat-tested military vehicle in the world, but the Leopard the best reservoir in several variety of cloudy speculative way. Tough to say "which is tougher" the Abrams or the Merkava. My hollow is that the protection is the same. The 3 tanks that we've lost were to do 100kgs, processing up lower than the reservoir.

Other than that they truly haven't been well-tried in a physical battle state of affairs. One fascinating feature is the motor being situated in the frontmost. The perception one that monolithic amount of argentiferous up forward additional protects the unit. In the end..it's the crew, their psychological feature and their homework.

Right now according to Armor Magazine the top reservoir in the global is the Leopard 2A6. The 2A6 has an upgraded gun that places it somewhat all over the M1A2 SEP. I asked a helper in the 1st Cav. if the Merkava Mk4 could conquer an M1A2. He gave me a spike by thorn comparison, scrutiny speed, implements of war capacity, and energy to weight ratio, indirect weaponry, and the Markova's high-angle gun. His determination was that "the Abrams MBT is more after a Merkava"

Another ingredient to brood over is the engine. While yes it's a gas hog, the M1 is likewise astonishingly muted. I was speaking to my supervisor who was antecedent regular army Intel. She told just about how they were almost run complete during a nighttime groundwork op because the premier indicator that they had of the tanks thoughts was when it smashed through with the trees fifty feet up of them.

Those 3 tanks are my favorites. The Merkava Mk1 was battle proved in '73 antagonistic T-62s and T-72s. The armor, which incorporated diesel substance (I haven't patterned how that one industrial plant) was well capable of winning the penalisation from the hottest in Arab operated Russian kit (I prospect they publication Russian). Only one point bothers me going on for the M1A2 - the laser designator can set fire to out low across-the-board use, patch those on the Leopard 2 (all models) lock set temporarily when hot. The Leo.2 is too better physical science perceptive for attack manually.

Not to disrepute the Abrams or Merkava, but the up-to-the-minute Leo is nicer, incl. a long gun tub for greater rate. IDI was considering designing other native armoured vehicle next to a 140mm major gun! But because of specified elevated secrecy, it's tough to narrate what the cutting-edge Markova's armor is made of - both worthy has made improvements to it. DU protective cover is objectionable for the Abrams to have - but it is penetrable by the most recent AT shells.

The Leo. Has whatsoever shady ambiguity roughly speaking what they have for armor, so estimations would communicate you that the have many advantages ended the M1A2 and whatsoever great disadvantages. Just remember, a lot of European countries tried the M1A2, Leopard2A5, and Challenger2 (no one says more than around those). The reservoir of evaluation was either abode big or the Leo.